That is your take on the article? I read it much differently: "In the weeks that followed, Eliza’s professional life became much quieter. Instead of formulati

That is your take on the article? I read it much differently: "In the weeks that followed, Eliza’s professional life became much quieter. Instead of formulating the London-based events agency’s marketing strategy from the office or attending live shows as part of her remit, her main duties now consisted of simply being available between 0900 and 1800, sending the occasional email and completing the odd routine task from home. " Seems she was doing important work, then made to do degrading work in an attempt to get her to quit. When she joined, did she apply for a position doing this work? Did she apply for an internal transfer from her current position to this one? It is astonishing that people such as yourself cant see what is clearly taking place here. She wasn't given an easy remote job.. she was transferred so she would quit and avoid a severance payout.