I don’t think it’s a mistranslation, the manuscripts themselves differ. Regardless of which is ‘correct,’ it’s likely an error in the retelling or copying. Thi

I don’t think it’s a mistranslation, the manuscripts themselves differ. Regardless of which is ‘correct,’ it’s likely an error in the retelling or copying. This person points out that either 616 or 666 could refer to Nero and some other possible evidence that was the case: http://kiwihellenist.blogspot.com/2018/06/the-number-of-beast.html?m=1 http://kiwihellenist.blogspot.com/2018/06/the-number-of-beas...