2 ms·
MVP implies that you show them the most valuable feature. It can simply be a mockup too! What you need, in my opinion, is basically your core proposition. Like
by jhoelzel 4y ago
MVP implies that you show them the most valuable feature. It can simply be a mockup too!
What you need, in my opinion, is basically your core proposition. Like if you build a killer robot, showing that it can hit any target you click on, is nice.. even though it might not be able to move.
If its a webapp, don't focus on solved problems, like Logins or SSO but rather show me what your "x for y" can do. After all the products you do actually buy are the ones, you think, will solve your problems.
- brianwawok 4y agoPeople want a product that works for MVP in most cases. If you are a brand new tech that no one has ever done, okay. But if there is even 1 competitor that kinda works, a mock-up is worth 0. So I think depends on the market for the product.
- jhoelzel 4y agoi disagree here! Not because i think you could not be right, but because there is much more room in one space. Like under this advisement apple never would have gone into phones. There was literally a phase were we were joking that somebody is building the "uber for X" or the "tinder for y" and im pretty sure a lot of those did get funding without having a single line of code in their names.
- brianwawok 4y agoIs you goal to get VC funding, or is your goal to sell to a client? To get VC funding, if the market is frothy enough, you don't even need a MVP, just a power point and a fancy resume. To sell to a client is what I was more along the lines of.