4 ms·

Again, your 3 questions do not provide any information with regards to trustworthiness. You have just decided that the Wuhan Lab is an epicenter of evil and the

Again, your 3 questions do not provide any information with regards to trustworthiness. You have just decided that the Wuhan Lab is an epicenter of evil and therefore anyone tangential is untrustworthy. There is no logical connection, you filled it in. With regards to Cernobyl, other than Anatoly Dyatlov (who can directly be ascribed blame and served prison time), it is really hard to blame any of the people involved. Yet there were all kinds of known and unknown stresses and defects in the system that resulted in a tragedy. Does that mean we should ban nuclear energy?

brigandish 4y ago
> You have just decided that the Wuhan Lab is an epicenter of evil and therefore anyone tangential is untrustworthy. I'm so glad you were able to read my mind, perhaps you could open source your mind reading device, or would that be too dangerous to share to the public? What I have decided is that there is evidence of lies by people involved in the funding and the implementation of the research at Wuhan, there really is no need for your clumsy straw men, especially when you can read my mind. > Does that mean we should ban nuclear energy? I'm the one arguing for the further distribution of technology, are you arguing with yourself now or did your mind reading device go on the blink?