2 ms·
One glaring omission from that article is any mention of per-capita emissions. The author keeps asserting that US-based measures to combat climate change are in
by benwad 4y ago
One glaring omission from that article is any mention of per-capita emissions. The author keeps asserting that US-based measures to combat climate change are ineffective because China pollutes more, but the US (and all Western countries) have a far larger per-capita footprint than China. Policies to reduce this footprint could have a huge effect on emissions globally, even though the US isn't the total biggest emitter in the world.
- md2020 4y agoYeah the same author has a reply to that since the per-capita emissions point is brought up a lot: https://noahpinion.substack.com/p/why-per-capita-emissions-is-a-bad https://noahpinion.substack.com/p/why-per-capita-emissions-i...