5 ms·
I think the problem is < fake books and > Amazons fundamentally broken reviews system. Seems like the fake review bots are a lot smarter than the anti-measures
by jgaa 4y ago
I think the problem is < fake books and > Amazons fundamentally broken reviews system.
Seems like the fake review bots are a lot smarter than the anti-measures applied by Amazon. And the fun part is that both parties are probably running on AWS ;)
- a3w 4y agoI think the problem is [bra] fake books and [ket] Amazons... I think the problem is [left] fake books and [Quote sign] Amazons... Okay, on the third try I read less and more. Still, it felt ugly.
- thr0wnawaytod4y 4y agoI thought it's just a fancy way to write (something and) something more important.
- thaumasiotes 4y agoIt took me two tries too; my first guess was "I think the problem is not as bad as fake books and worse than Amazon's fundamentally broken review system", but that didn't make sense. The symbols < and > are being used as substitutes for the English words "less" and "more", which is not conventional at all, but is related enough to the actual meaning of the symbols that given context and a lot of effort, you can get there. I wouldn't recommend copying the notation; it conflicts pretty badly with the ordinary use of < and >.