4 ms·
Japanese tried the same thing - dropping kanji[0] and kana[1] entirely in favor of romaji[2]. It failed primarily for the same reason that English spelling refo
by kmeisthax 4y ago
Japanese tried the same thing - dropping kanji[0] and kana[1] entirely in favor of romaji[2]. It failed primarily for the same reason that English spelling reform fails, which is that we the horrifically mangled and confusing orthography to distinguish words spelled the same way.
[0] Characters derived from Chinese. Each character has both an embedded meaning and one or more readings. They look like this: 漢字
[1] Characters that spell out whole syllables. The glyphs are typographically derived from kanji, but very simplified and without meanings. Due to medieval Japanese gender politics, there are two of them. They look like this: ひらがな and カタカナ.
[2] The characters you are using right now.
- contingencies 4y agoJapan is the only culture I know of with three or four concurrent systems in use. China could be said to have two. Taiwan could be said to have three, if you could bopomofo.
- samus 4y agoJapanese could get rid of either Hiragana or Katakana if they really wanted, since both of them are fully functional syllabaries. But in Taiwan, the choice between Bopomofo, Pinyin, and their local variant of Pinyin has political significance because it is taken to be reflective of their stance to the Mainland.