3 ms·
Wow, great suggestion. I will check it.
by antonomon 4y ago
Wow, great suggestion. I will check it.
- parthianshotgun 4y agoI'd really look into the validity of the book, a cursory google search reveals that's it's basically a load of shit. Also the book is narrated by Stefan Molyneux, which, I wouldn't say is a 'happy accident' when it comes to Molyneux oeuvre
- antonomon 4y agoLol wtf? Jesus christ, nevermind then.
- nonrandomstring 4y agoSomeone you don't like read a book. Therefore the book is rubbish. I suppose this is the logic we get from kids raised by algorithms.
- parthianshotgun 4y agoMy perspective is velenced by my own biases, just like yours. My function here was just to provide a countering force to your force, and let the OP atleast be presented with the opportunity to be skeptical (mirroring the discourse around this topic, no doubt). It's worth pointing out that psychohistory is not a serious field, and largely considered a pseudoscience.