3 ms·

the fact that it is banned in some countries like danemark that you know gets the top spot in worldwide healthcare. but you can trust a company that had to pay

the fact that it is banned in some countries like danemark that you know gets the top spot in worldwide healthcare. but you can trust a company that had to pay billions for lying instead.

barbazoo 4y ago
Not a ban: https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-coronavirus-denmark-idUSL1N2ZS0J8 https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-coronavirus-denmar... Also, what about the dozens of developed countries, many of which in the EU with good health care, that do offer vaccines for children?
- retinaros 4y ago
  you are linking an article that just states what I wrote. being a journalist is more and more misleading nowadays. they could be replaced by bots we wouldnt see a difference. « From 1 July, 2022, it will no longer be possible for children and youngsters under the age of 18 to receive the 1st jab, and from 1 September, 2022, it will no longer be possible to receive the 2nd jab,” the Danish Health Authority said. The change was because children and young people rarely suffer severe outcomes of the Omicron variant, it said. » that is what a ban is. NO LONGER POSSIBLE.
  - smt88 4y ago
    > that is what a ban is. NO LONGER POSSIBLE. You should have kept reading. > "The authority said that some children with an increased risk would still be eligible for vaccination, after an assessment from a doctor." So that is not what a ban is. It's still possible for children to get vaccines, and this decision by Denmark isn't proof that it's a bad idea for children to get vaccines or that it's a bad idea for adults to get vaccines. When you have to grasp at straws like this, doesn't it sometimes feel like maybe (just maybe) it's time to change your mind about this thing that the vast majority of experts disagree with you on?
    - weesh 4y ago
      denmark's view is completely rational. high risk kids get the vaccine. low risk kids who will be fine don't have to get it. america is trying to push this stuff into schools and into your mind so Pfizer can make an absolute killing.
      - brianwawok 4y ago
        Or like… the less kids that get infected, the less kids miss school? It’s still worth it to avoid missed school days.
    - retinaros 4y ago
      ok a ban for kids minus auto immune kids and kids from americans expats (minus prifzer execs kids) make sense. and you know why they did that? because unlike us they value children lives more than old people because they are the future of society. in other countries we sacrify our youngs so the old can be safe and live off their wealth. confinements, vaccines that have higher risk than covid (for,kids and that is why danemark banned it for the average kid) dont worry youll join danemark decision in ten years when lawsuits will be everywhere in the u.s

the fact that it is banned in some countries like danemark that you know gets the top spot in worldwide healthcare. but you can trust a company that had to pay billions for lying instead.

barbazoo 4y ago

Not a ban: https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-coronavirus-denmark-idUSL1N2ZS0J8 https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-coronavirus-denmar... Also, what about the dozens of developed countries, many of which in the EU with good health care, that do offer vaccines for children?

retinaros 4y ago
you are linking an article that just states what I wrote. being a journalist is more and more misleading nowadays. they could be replaced by bots we wouldnt see a difference. « From 1 July, 2022, it will no longer be possible for children and youngsters under the age of 18 to receive the 1st jab, and from 1 September, 2022, it will no longer be possible to receive the 2nd jab,” the Danish Health Authority said. The change was because children and young people rarely suffer severe outcomes of the Omicron variant, it said. » that is what a ban is. NO LONGER POSSIBLE.
- smt88 4y ago
  > that is what a ban is. NO LONGER POSSIBLE. You should have kept reading. > "The authority said that some children with an increased risk would still be eligible for vaccination, after an assessment from a doctor." So that is not what a ban is. It's still possible for children to get vaccines, and this decision by Denmark isn't proof that it's a bad idea for children to get vaccines or that it's a bad idea for adults to get vaccines. When you have to grasp at straws like this, doesn't it sometimes feel like maybe (just maybe) it's time to change your mind about this thing that the vast majority of experts disagree with you on?
  - weesh 4y ago
    denmark's view is completely rational. high risk kids get the vaccine. low risk kids who will be fine don't have to get it. america is trying to push this stuff into schools and into your mind so Pfizer can make an absolute killing.
    - brianwawok 4y ago
      Or like… the less kids that get infected, the less kids miss school? It’s still worth it to avoid missed school days.
  - retinaros 4y ago
    ok a ban for kids minus auto immune kids and kids from americans expats (minus prifzer execs kids) make sense. and you know why they did that? because unlike us they value children lives more than old people because they are the future of society. in other countries we sacrify our youngs so the old can be safe and live off their wealth. confinements, vaccines that have higher risk than covid (for,kids and that is why danemark banned it for the average kid) dont worry youll join danemark decision in ten years when lawsuits will be everywhere in the u.s