He says that Kagi doesn’t keep any identifying logs, so I think your example would not be possible. He makes a useful distinction between designing for privacy

He says that Kagi doesn’t keep any identifying logs, so I think your example would not be possible. He makes a useful distinction between designing for privacy, and being unable to report on what users are doing, and building a system that is anonymous at a level of something like Tor. He could certainly have added in another example to his list, perhaps a dissident under a dangerous regime, but the meaning was clear to me. Personally, I think the comment is a fair one, and that it’s unreasonable to take offence to it, although I can see why some at the fringes of privacy advocacy, perhaps those already using Tor for all their web usage, or only paying with cash, might consider Kagi to be beneath them.