>Citation needed. That parents are generally the most trustworthy individuals in a child's life should be common sense. I may not agree with every parent’s ide

>Citation needed. That parents are generally the most trustworthy individuals in a child's life should be common sense. I may not agree with every parent’s ideology or beliefs, but I will stand for their right to have a parental role in their own children’s lives. You seem to believe that this right should be revoked if their ideas on homosexuality don’t align with yours. >who they interact with Parents have a responsibility to make sure that their child is not interacting with people who might hurt them, or be a negative influence on them. >and what ideas they're exposed to Citation needed. I’m sure religious parents teach their children about homosexuality, they just mention it’s a sin rather than saying that it’s a person’s valid choice. They teach the moral standards that they believe are the truth and will benefit their child. You want to impose your standards of morality instead, which I’m saying is certainly not within your or the FSF’s right. >people who homeschool their children are viewed with some suspicion Really? I’ve never heard this opinion before. Homeschooling is perfectly fine, and parents that I’ve heard do it let their children interact with other children who’re homeschooled as well. They are thought together, at least sometimes. >they're still people who exist in society - not property Don’t lie. Don’t straw-man what I said. Parents have many rights over their children, but that does not mean that anybody here is likening them to a watch or a pair of slippers. These sorts of dishonest responses are getting tiresome.