You’re correct, and, yes, it can apply to virtually anything. But we don’t let that hold us hostage for properly mitigating risk. I think the distinction is wh

You’re correct, and, yes, it can apply to virtually anything. But we don’t let that hold us hostage for properly mitigating risk. I think the distinction is when a threat is “imminent”. To the point of this thread, I don’t think the dialogue has progressed enough to form a consensus on where that “imminent threshold” lies. Teaching someone about DNA doesn’t constitute an imminent threat. But the equivalent of teaching the recipe for a biological weapon may be considered enough of an imminent risk to warrant regulation.