"Blossom will use the GPLv3 license, with commercial licensing similar to the Sencha model." I don't have a clear idea about what's going on in the SproutCore

"Blossom will use the GPLv3 license, with commercial licensing similar to the Sencha model." I don't have a clear idea about what's going on in the SproutCore community, but I don't think this has universal support. One of the reasons we rebranded to Amber is that our codebase is inspired by SproutCore 1, but it is a complete rewrite, targeting a smaller file size and web-centric development. All of the fragments of SproutCore 1.x target native-style applications with a ton of JavaScript, while Amber targets ambitious web-style applications using HTML and CSS for the presentation layer. Amber apps don't have much in common with SproutCore 1 (or "blossom") apps, so a clean naming break felt like a clarifying thing to do.