3 ms·
> I do not care about layers or whatever ergonomic arguments that arise. I tend to think this is more a matter of preference, so, sure, this keyboard isn't for
by rgoulter 4y ago
> I do not care about layers or whatever ergonomic arguments that arise.
I tend to think this is more a matter of preference, so, sure, this keyboard isn't for you.
But what's your experience with layering? Is it "tried it, reached the same typing speed as before, didn't like it", or?
- fbdab103 4y agoThe way many of these keyboards work with layering makes it a functional requirement rather than a choice. For the (very) premium price, I would rather they include the additional keys and let me decide if I want to utilize layering. I have enough low-utilization keys that I want always accessible without any impediment. My desk is not space constrained such that an additional physical row or two of keys is going to make my workspace unusable. If I choose to embrace layering and never use the F-keys, fine. However, if I want to only ever utilize 12 keys and do some monstrous chording setup, also an option.
- rgoulter 4y agoI think removing the function row goes hand in hand with other design decisions. Comparing to the freestyle pro, this advantage360: neither has a numpad. But the advantage360 also has: symmetrical / not row staggered, more keys for the thumb to reach (rather than just a big spacebar) which allows for reduced pinky finger usage. I think removing the function row follows coherently in line with these other decisions.