No it is not science. If the objective is to be “fair” then they don’t like the outcome then that’s not science. If the objective is to increase the amount of

No it is not science. If the objective is to be “fair” then they don’t like the outcome then that’s not science. If the objective is to increase the amount of certain skin colors, then fine. But call it that. Don’t be racist and then wrap it up in a lie saying that it’s to be “fair”. “Fair” in the way it’s used in the article is entirely subjective, which is not scientific. When the system is as obviously corrupt as it is now, people lose faith in the system entirely and that’s what’s happened. > The problem is that universities don't really have the ability to invest in education and safety in lower income areas. I wasn’t talking about the universities, I was talking about the government. If the government is willing to dump hundreds of billions into Ukraine, I’d rather see that money going into creating businesses, schools and safety in the most egregious areas of our own country and build them up. Create competitive applicants by destroying generational poverty. Not by bending admission standards and lying to everyone’s face as if we are racist for pointing out their racism. I would much rather see my tax dollars funding this rebuilding of the worst parts of the country than war. And if it produces hundreds of thousands of competitive students one generation from now, we all benefit because they won’t be as underrepresented and we can get rid of these racist policies by radical left fascists that believe that more racism is the answer for racism.