3 ms·
To be fair here it’s a bit apples to oranges. Gitlab is optimised more towards running your own runners, it’s natively supported and extremely easy to set them
by dijit 4y ago
To be fair here it’s a bit apples to oranges.
Gitlab is optimised more towards running your own runners, it’s natively supported and extremely easy to set them up.
GitHub on the other hand provides you CI which has the possibility to self-host, but they’re sort of awkward to use due to the fact they force you to use odd tags and you don’t get all the features.
- wdb 4y agoDoesn't mean they could have the same level of runner spec as Github. Especially, when you pay a lot of money for Gitlab. Github std spec is ~7gb + 2vcpu while on Gitlab you need to pay double minutes to get that. They could at least match that for their paid plans. Personally, I think, Gitlab keeps adding a lot of features but the core CI related functionality seem to get less attention these days.