> I don't think it is "clearly false". And you've offered me no contrary evidence Obviously I have. First I have pointed to you that it is illegal. Secondly I

> I don't think it is "clearly false". And you've offered me no contrary evidence Obviously I have. First I have pointed to you that it is illegal. Secondly I have mentioned Nike to you. After the 1996 Life magazine report and the subsequent protest, they lost millions of dollars of sales and had to work on the issue significantly in the following years to save their image. You keep torpedoing your own argument yourself anyway by bringing up all the articles covering the issue which should show you people care. This conversation is over as far as I’m concerned. I’m impressed by the length you are ready to go to refuse to simply admit you are wrong.