4 ms·
Not to mention, trivially debunked by typing the term into a search engine: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22cloud+repatriation%22&oq=%22cloud+repatriation%22
by PragmaticPulp 4y ago
Not to mention, trivially debunked by typing the term into a search engine: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22cloud+repatriation%22&oq=%22cloud+repatriation%22 https://www.google.com/search?q=%22cloud+repatriation%22&oq=...
I know HN comments bias heavily toward anti-cloud, but the suggestion that all of the search engines are conspiring together to bury some massive underground anti-cloud movement (that conveniently confirms anti-cloud beliefs but is unfortunately just hidden by evil search engines) is laughable.
- fock 4y agothey however need the quotes. Otherwise you drown in noise about the great cloud. Have you tried searching for performance figures without disabling amazon, azure and google in the search? You won't find any. Still it's probably just the general noise of the fully oligopolized internet :).
- withinboredom 4y agoThe researcher may also be getting "personalized results" that have been biased by prior searches. I can't imagine how you'd even control for that.
- hinkley 4y agoI have never heard of 'cloud repatriation' until this very thread. So if that's what I'm looking for but I don't know what it's called, I have to use other terms, which are likely to be SEO'd to hell and back. That's the yardstick to use here.