While I don’t know the whole story, this letter makes me feel this guy is in the right: > In other words, in 2011, federal and state agencies lowered the maxim

While I don’t know the whole story, this letter makes me feel this guy is in the right: > In other words, in 2011, federal and state agencies lowered the maximum safe fluoridation levels by half, and lowered the “recommended” levels by a third, but declined to require any mandatory minimum level of fluoridation. > This misunderstanding was not due to anything 1 said or did. T consistently reported the accurate fluoridation levels to the State in monthly reports and to Richmond Water System Customers in annual reports. 2011 was around the time of the local scandal I witnessed. There was pressure to lower flouridation levels, and many people freaked out - quoting Dr Strangelove - rather than listening to science. The local scandal I witnessed was eventually resolved when the State dental association got involved. It would be nice if the Vermont dental association weighed in.