3 ms·
Fair enough, I may not have used the correct word, but it is still a typical “told you” situation, both during development, after go’s initial appearance and ev
by kaba0 4y ago
Fair enough, I may not have used the correct word, but it is still a typical “told you” situation, both during development, after go’s initial appearance and ever since until it finally was decided that it should be indeed implemented.
- kcartlidge 4y agoTrue. Whilst I haven't missed it in Go myself, enough other people say they do that its inclusion was inevitable. Which means it probably should have gone in sooner.
- chrsig 4y agoThere's a big misconception that the creators of go didn't want generics. They've stated a number of times that they didn't have a design that they all thought was adequate. After several years and attempts at a good enough proposal, Ian Lance Taylor put one out that was able to cross the finish line, and now we have generics.
- kcartlidge 4y ago> They've stated a number of times that they didn't have a design that they all thought was adequate You know what, with all the 'discussions' in recent years about whether Go should have generics I'd actually lost track of that amongst all the noise. Which is irritating, as I do now remember the early conversations about it. Thank you for the reminder.