Can you define for me what makes the suit abusive? Is the defendant following the law and being wrongfully sued? Or are they breaking the law but should only

Can you define for me what makes the suit abusive? Is the defendant following the law and being wrongfully sued? Or are they breaking the law but should only be held accountable if a disabled person has the energy, time, and money to go through the court system? It’s sounding like “it’s annoying to serve disabled people, businesses should be able to get away with not doing that.” In my mind we are literally dealing with people who are abusing (ignoring) ADA to make a profit, but you are calling the OTHER side profit-seeking abusers.