3 ms·
> Basically you are trying to make an argument by redefining words to make arbitrary distinctions that don't have any bearing on whether physicalism is true or
by naasking 4y ago
> Basically you are trying to make an argument by redefining words to make arbitrary distinctions that don't have any bearing on whether physicalism is true or false.
No, this is a well studied problem by thousands of philosophers over 40 years. Maybe reconsider your position that you understand this argument better than they do. I don't see any benefit in continuing this discussion at this point.
- pdonis 4y ago> No, this is a well studied problem by thousands of philosophers over 40 years. Maybe reconsider your position that you understand this argument better than they do. Ah, the old argument from authority. Sorry, not buying it. > I don't see any benefit in continuing this discussion at this point. Neither do I.