> Again, there is a distinction to be made between the outputs of the model and the model itself! Oh, you mean the very first thing I had to explain to you at

> Again, there is a distinction to be made between the outputs of the model and the model itself! Oh, you mean the very first thing I had to explain to you at the beginning of this exchange because you seemed to be ignoring it? Very little of these discussions has been about the models. Most of the discussion is about the outputs, and there the fair-use case is - as Lemley/Casey and Ochoa both concede - much weaker. But by all means keep going on about feelings. We can all tell it's not others' feelings that are being hurt by mere disagreement.