> Well that's a given Funny way to admit that your original statement was flat-out wrong. There is no separate "civil law jurisprudence" and "common law juris

> Well that's a given Funny way to admit that your original statement was flat-out wrong. There is no separate "civil law jurisprudence" and "common law jurisprudence". Common law by itself is by definition not jurisprudence. Civil law combines aspects of statutory and common law (as one form of precedent) into a single system. Some aspects of common law even make their way into criminal law. Instead of just Googling for buzzwords, learn what they mean before you try to bluster your way through an argument with them.