4 ms·

These high school placements into university labs are a classic example of how privilege plays out, converting socio economic status into plausible credentials.

by gujk 15y ago

These high school placements into university labs are a classic example of how privilege plays out, converting socio economic status into plausible credentials. Connected parents get glamorous internships for their kids that massively overstated the kids' contributions to and translate into elite college placements. No one can say these kids aren't smart and deserving, but what about kids who are also smart and deserving but not related to researchers or their friends? I prefer math contests where any kid who can reach the library has a downtown tty good opportunity.

maayank 15y ago
"I prefer math contests where any kid who can reach the library has a downtown tty good opportunity." It's funny that you mentioned math, because I thought about it while reading the rest of your message. In my university I know many (over a dozen) people who had their math degree (or most of it) done in high school/are in high school and are currently pursuing it. Virtually all of them (all but one) have a parent who's professionally into mathematics (most have parents who are PhDs or professors of math, another parent has a PhD in electrical engineering, etc.).
- gujk 15y ago
  You are absolutely going have some familial encouragement and support in any field. I was one of few of my math peer group in high school and college who didn't have Ph.D parents. (I had plenty of support, and but not direct parental direction in math. They drove me to the library and to my math team practice before school. I can't imagine how they could have given me nearly as much support in chem lab... And I even did a college chem lab one summer in high school, as part of a math summer program!)
ChuckMcM 15y ago
I call bullshit on the 'privilege' claim. Colleges are recruiting from extra curricular activities, clubs and honor societies. They reach out to those kids and offer them a chance to go to 'summer camp' and often offer financial aid to those who qualify but can't afford it. I would not disagree that if you are in a position where you have to work to support your family while you are going to high school a number of opportunities are unavailable, but that represents a much smaller group of kids. You take any smart and deserving kid and have them participate in activities that the universities are watching, and they will reach out. Take the SAT or PSAT and make your scores available and they will reach out. Go to university websites and email the professors who are working on interesting projects and they are often happy to share information with you, and if you are 'smart and deserving' they will reach out too.
- scarmig 15y ago
  I would say this is an unrealistic view of how elite college admissions work. These days, having perfect SAT scores, good grades in AP/IB classes, and ordinary involvement in extracurriculars is a weak approach to getting into an elite university. It takes some extra-ordinary achievement in some extracurricular to make you stand out from the mass. That kind of extra-ordinary achievement is easily gamed by people with privilege but much more difficult for the rest of us in the 99% (well, the 90%).
  - tokenadult 15y ago
    having perfect SAT scores Having perfect SAT scores, that is literally at the peak of the scoring scale on all test sections, is still quite rare. http://media.collegeboard.com/digitalServices/pdf/SAT-Percentile-Ranks-Composite-CR-M-W-2011.pdf http://media.collegeboard.com/digitalServices/pdf/SAT-Percen... All students with perfect SAT scores could fit comfortably into the entering class of just one of the eight Ivy League colleges, with none left over for MIT, Stanford, Caltech, or any of the other seven Ivy League colleges. The mathematical consequence of this (by the pigeonhole principle) is that all elite colleges, without exception, admit many students who missed questions on the SAT. Caltech is almost the only college with a small enough entering class to have a possible chance of having a majority of enrolled students with literally perfect SAT scores. The interquartile score ranges reported for the most recent first-year class at Caltech http://collegesearch.collegeboard.com/search/CollegeDetail.jsp?collegeId=4214&profileId=6 http://collegesearch.collegeboard.com/search/CollegeDetail.j... show that even Caltech has to enroll a majority of new students who missed questions on the SAT. I am of course fully agreed that a strong application to colleges that selective includes not only high test scores and high grades in challenging subjects, but also involvement in some meaningful extracurricular activity.
    - scarmig 15y ago
      Well, yes, meaning that elite colleges use other discriminators to choose their students now, once you've gotten a good-enough score. It'd actually be more egalitarian and meritocratic to use scores, though, especially if there were a revised test to differentiate the almost-perfect-and-perfect crowd from one another. Those other filters--the meaningful extracurricular activities--often enough amount to "let's let in the girl who got a paper published in high school through a special internship or the guy who climbed Mt. Everest" that they're sort of a joke, in that people with special resources and parental connections have an automatic edge over equally qualified people who don't.
dromidas 15y ago
It's the way life works. If we reigned in the best achievers to the same level of achievement as the worst level of achievers to make everyone 'equal' then we might as well just fire off all the nukes cause humans would be doomed. Read some Atlas Shrugged, the bottom of the pyramid is necessary. Without it we'd have a flat line, and you know what else is a flat line? The way a no longer beating heart reads on an EKG in a hospital.
- Bjartr 15y ago
  erm, perhaps instead of pulling the meritorious down we propel the others up?

by gujk 15y ago

maayank 15y ago

"I prefer math contests where any kid who can reach the library has a downtown tty good opportunity." It's funny that you mentioned math, because I thought about it while reading the rest of your message. In my university I know many (over a dozen) people who had their math degree (or most of it) done in high school/are in high school and are currently pursuing it. Virtually all of them (all but one) have a parent who's professionally into mathematics (most have parents who are PhDs or professors of math, another parent has a PhD in electrical engineering, etc.).

gujk 15y ago
You are absolutely going have some familial encouragement and support in any field. I was one of few of my math peer group in high school and college who didn't have Ph.D parents. (I had plenty of support, and but not direct parental direction in math. They drove me to the library and to my math team practice before school. I can't imagine how they could have given me nearly as much support in chem lab... And I even did a college chem lab one summer in high school, as part of a math summer program!)

ChuckMcM 15y ago

I call bullshit on the 'privilege' claim. Colleges are recruiting from extra curricular activities, clubs and honor societies. They reach out to those kids and offer them a chance to go to 'summer camp' and often offer financial aid to those who qualify but can't afford it. I would not disagree that if you are in a position where you have to work to support your family while you are going to high school a number of opportunities are unavailable, but that represents a much smaller group of kids. You take any smart and deserving kid and have them participate in activities that the universities are watching, and they will reach out. Take the SAT or PSAT and make your scores available and they will reach out. Go to university websites and email the professors who are working on interesting projects and they are often happy to share information with you, and if you are 'smart and deserving' they will reach out too.

scarmig 15y ago
I would say this is an unrealistic view of how elite college admissions work. These days, having perfect SAT scores, good grades in AP/IB classes, and ordinary involvement in extracurriculars is a weak approach to getting into an elite university. It takes some extra-ordinary achievement in some extracurricular to make you stand out from the mass. That kind of extra-ordinary achievement is easily gamed by people with privilege but much more difficult for the rest of us in the 99% (well, the 90%).
- tokenadult 15y ago
  having perfect SAT scores Having perfect SAT scores, that is literally at the peak of the scoring scale on all test sections, is still quite rare. http://media.collegeboard.com/digitalServices/pdf/SAT-Percentile-Ranks-Composite-CR-M-W-2011.pdf http://media.collegeboard.com/digitalServices/pdf/SAT-Percen... All students with perfect SAT scores could fit comfortably into the entering class of just one of the eight Ivy League colleges, with none left over for MIT, Stanford, Caltech, or any of the other seven Ivy League colleges. The mathematical consequence of this (by the pigeonhole principle) is that all elite colleges, without exception, admit many students who missed questions on the SAT. Caltech is almost the only college with a small enough entering class to have a possible chance of having a majority of enrolled students with literally perfect SAT scores. The interquartile score ranges reported for the most recent first-year class at Caltech http://collegesearch.collegeboard.com/search/CollegeDetail.jsp?collegeId=4214&profileId=6 http://collegesearch.collegeboard.com/search/CollegeDetail.j... show that even Caltech has to enroll a majority of new students who missed questions on the SAT. I am of course fully agreed that a strong application to colleges that selective includes not only high test scores and high grades in challenging subjects, but also involvement in some meaningful extracurricular activity.
  - scarmig 15y ago
    Well, yes, meaning that elite colleges use other discriminators to choose their students now, once you've gotten a good-enough score. It'd actually be more egalitarian and meritocratic to use scores, though, especially if there were a revised test to differentiate the almost-perfect-and-perfect crowd from one another. Those other filters--the meaningful extracurricular activities--often enough amount to "let's let in the girl who got a paper published in high school through a special internship or the guy who climbed Mt. Everest" that they're sort of a joke, in that people with special resources and parental connections have an automatic edge over equally qualified people who don't.

dromidas 15y ago

It's the way life works. If we reigned in the best achievers to the same level of achievement as the worst level of achievers to make everyone 'equal' then we might as well just fire off all the nukes cause humans would be doomed. Read some Atlas Shrugged, the bottom of the pyramid is necessary. Without it we'd have a flat line, and you know what else is a flat line? The way a no longer beating heart reads on an EKG in a hospital.

Bjartr 15y ago
erm, perhaps instead of pulling the meritorious down we propel the others up?