3 ms·
This lady is doing important work; her comments are thoughtful, balanced, not overtly cynical or vindictive, not hyperbolic, stated fairly plainly. I don't sens
by jasmer 4y ago
This lady is doing important work; her comments are thoughtful, balanced, not overtly cynical or vindictive, not hyperbolic, stated fairly plainly. I don't sense she's trying to get super famous from being an antagonist. Refreshing.
- arlcode 4y agoJup. And every post is short, to the point and links it sources at the end. I find this really refreshing in contrast to the avalanche of SEO optimized "Let's start with the history of money in 6000 BC" spam. This respects both our, mine and her, limited lifetimes.
- c0mptonFP 4y agoShe's doing everything in her power to become famous/viral. Look at the amount of work she puts into SEO and her own Wikipedia page. She's a Wikipedia editor that edits her own page. Can't get more self-absorbed than that.
- iLoveOncall 4y ago> Look at the amount of work she puts into her own Wikipedia page. She's a Wikipedia editor that edits her own page. What you are saying is verifiably wrong, as you can see yourself that she has not edited her own page even once: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Molly_White_(writer)&action=history&offset=&limit=500 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Molly_White_(writ... (her username is GorillaWarfare: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:GorillaWarfare https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:GorillaWarfare)
- c0mptonFP 4y agoAFAICS the edit history goes back to May 2022, however the site has existed long before that. Not convinced
- mw888 4y agoThey are in the article - their actual website is clearly vindictive and even brags about being SEO optimized to tru p other Web3 queries. Let’s at least be self aware.