5 ms·

You literally admitted it, landlords provide nothing, all they do is finance private spending. Once the property is paid for the landlord gets to keep an apprec

You literally admitted it, landlords provide nothing, all they do is finance private spending. Once the property is paid for the landlord gets to keep an appreciating asset and generate cash flow from it by stealing from the tenant's paycheck. Literally leeches on society.

tempestn 4y ago
If the landlord isn't there to buy the house, it won't get built in the first place. Not everyone can afford to buy a house, so someone needs to provide that capital in order for the housing to exist. No one is stealing anything; the tenant is paying the landlord for the service of lending them the house to live in. The landlord is being compensated for the funds they have tied up in the house, that they can't use to invest in (buy) other things. Like, literally, if there were no landlords, by definition there would be no rental properties. So people who couldn't afford to buy a house outright would have nowhere to live. That can't be what you're advocating?
- bilvar 4y ago
  - amrocha 4y ago
    This condescension is so tiring. You're literally so brainwashed by your ideology that you can't conceive of anyone disagreeing with it. Clearly they must all be idiots who just don't understand economics. There's no way you could be wrong. Housing just inherently has all these problems and there's nothing we can do about it I guess.
    - bilvar 4y ago
      You are not disagreeing with any ideology. You are just categorising a whole class of people as leeches by disregarding the economic realities of the situation, because it doesn’t fit with your economically uninformed one.
- amrocha 4y ago
  No, if the funds to buy the resources, physical and human, to build the housing aren't there then it won't get built. There's no rule that these funds have to come from private entities trying to turn a profit on housing. Are you really so ideologically brainwashed that you're incapable of imagining any other system that doesn't inherently exploit poor people and concentrates cash at the top???
  - sokoloff 4y ago
    Are you so ideologically bent on thinking that things ought to work some other way to utterly reject the reality of how things actually work right now?
bombcar 4y ago
If that’s the landlords what does that make the banks? They charge rent on money and money doesn’t even need maintenance!

tempestn 4y ago

If the landlord isn't there to buy the house, it won't get built in the first place. Not everyone can afford to buy a house, so someone needs to provide that capital in order for the housing to exist. No one is stealing anything; the tenant is paying the landlord for the service of lending them the house to live in. The landlord is being compensated for the funds they have tied up in the house, that they can't use to invest in (buy) other things. Like, literally, if there were no landlords, by definition there would be no rental properties. So people who couldn't afford to buy a house outright would have nowhere to live. That can't be what you're advocating?

bilvar 4y ago
- amrocha 4y ago
  This condescension is so tiring. You're literally so brainwashed by your ideology that you can't conceive of anyone disagreeing with it. Clearly they must all be idiots who just don't understand economics. There's no way you could be wrong. Housing just inherently has all these problems and there's nothing we can do about it I guess.
  - bilvar 4y ago
    You are not disagreeing with any ideology. You are just categorising a whole class of people as leeches by disregarding the economic realities of the situation, because it doesn’t fit with your economically uninformed one.
amrocha 4y ago
No, if the funds to buy the resources, physical and human, to build the housing aren't there then it won't get built. There's no rule that these funds have to come from private entities trying to turn a profit on housing. Are you really so ideologically brainwashed that you're incapable of imagining any other system that doesn't inherently exploit poor people and concentrates cash at the top???
- sokoloff 4y ago
  Are you so ideologically bent on thinking that things ought to work some other way to utterly reject the reality of how things actually work right now?

bombcar 4y ago

If that’s the landlords what does that make the banks? They charge rent on money and money doesn’t even need maintenance!