> I find it less likely that all 37 reviewed the paper, data and methodologies with throughness. Don't forget we live in a highly politicized environment where

> I find it less likely that all 37 reviewed the paper, data and methodologies with throughness. Don't forget we live in a highly politicized environment where going against the narrative gets you banned, censored, mocked, and dethroned. There is very strong incentives to publish things that support the narrative. Doesn't even matter if the methods used to arrive at the conclusions make any sense. As long as it supports the narrative, it's good stuff. To do otherwise can cost your career.