You do raise good points. > If the restaurant owners, none. If the disabled, all. And there isn't really an in-between is there? Are you sure there's no in-be

You do raise good points. > If the restaurant owners, none. If the disabled, all. And there isn't really an in-between is there? Are you sure there's no in-between? I gave this grand total of few seconds of thought. Could perhaps the government or the city step in and provide wheelchair accessibility to select restaurants, based on feasibility, cost, location, and perhaps some other criteria? Restaurant owners suffer because of these laws. Are you 100% sure the suffering of the restaurant owners under these laws is lesser than the suffering of the disabled without these laws?