3 ms·
There are a lot more mail domains signed with DNSSEC/DANE than with MTA-STS. So using your argument that DNSSEC is dead because no one is using it actually work
by AndyMcConachie 4y ago
There are a lot more mail domains signed with DNSSEC/DANE than with MTA-STS. So using your argument that DNSSEC is dead because no one is using it actually works in DANE's favor in this instance. MTA-STS is dead. DANE ate its lunch.
- tptacek 4y agoOnce again: there are literally millions of domains signed with DNSSEC because registrars, especially in Europe, auto-sign. That doesn't mean anything. I get that you're probably joking here, but the idea of the 28-year-old DNSSEC project, deployed on less than 4% of .COM and virtually nowhere in the actual industry, declaring victory over an RFC from 2018 is, of course, risible. I assume that was the intention, though.