3 ms·
This is the same Pfizer that recently admitted under oath that they never actually tested the vaccine against transmissibility. https://www.news.com.au/technol
by yucky 4y ago
This is the same Pfizer that recently admitted under oath that they never actually tested the vaccine against transmissibility.
https://www.news.com.au/technology/science/human-body/pfizer-did-not-know-whether-covid-vaccine-stopped-transmission-before-rollout-executive-admits/news-story/f307f28f794e173ac017a62784fec414 https://www.news.com.au/technology/science/human-body/pfizer...
- gus_massa 4y agoThat is well known. If you read the research papers all vaccines only claim a reduction of hospitalization. IIRC both mRNA vaccines have a 80%-90% reduction of hospitalization if double blind randomized controlled trials. For me, it looks like a good outcome and a good test method.
- soupbowl 4y agoWe just need to forget all the country leaders and experts telling us it did stop transmission.
- yucky 4y agoIf that's the case, then what exactly was the justification for mandates?
- manfre 4y agoTo reduce hospitalizations and avoid overwhelming the hospitals.
- yucky 4y agoNo that was masking, social distancing and lockdowns. By the time the vaccines rolled out the threat of hospital strain was gone and we were told it was to save grandma, if you weren't concerned with it. Workplaces mandated it "to protect our workers". Every single political leader and public health official claimed the vaccines would reduce transmission. Now we know they were all lying when they said that.