3 ms·
OK, AI is bad but compare it to human doctors/radiologists that are often worse. I still remember stats from some X-ray detection where AI diagnosed with 40% a
by bitL 4y ago
OK, AI is bad but compare it to human doctors/radiologists that are often worse. I still remember stats from some X-ray detection where AI diagnosed with 40% accuracy and the best human doctors with 38% accuracy (and median human doctors with 32% accuracy). Now what are we supposed to do?
- pcurve 4y agoCan you cite the source? Is it not possible to improve the 40% rate by AI? Obviously someone eventually figured out the 100%
- dmurray 4y agoThey might have "figured it out" by cutting the patient open.
- yrgulation 4y agoOh god (science for some of us) the same kind of logic for defending tesla’s fsd system. Both crappy and dangerous, but with cult like following.
- naijaboiler 4y agoAlmost any paper like this is worthless. It makes for good headlines. But it does nothing to further medical care