> To be fair, I have seen the "ramble generically on the subject of the question" strategy manually implemented by humans too, in the hopes that if you throw en

> To be fair, I have seen the "ramble generically on the subject of the question" strategy manually implemented by humans too, in the hopes that if you throw enough BS at the question you might get partial credit by luck. I had a college professor that knew to recognize this and actively warned against it during the mid-term and final. He said that every question will be answerable in 2 or 3 sentences, and that if you write 2-3 paragraphs instead, he would mark you down even if the answer was correct because you're wasting his time and may have dropped in correct statements that answered the question by luck. So often in school, we'd be getting quizzes/tests back, and I'd peek over at someone else's paper as it was being handed back and notice they wrote an entire paragraph to answer, whereas I answered it in a single sentence and got full credit for a correct answer, and I was always left wondering what the hell they wrote about.