4 ms·
Does this mean we can now have a StumpWM port (or equivalent) for Wayland? Is this already in the works?
by ssivark 4y ago
Does this mean we can now have a StumpWM port (or equivalent) for Wayland? Is this already in the works?
- timidger 4y agoThis is a client library only (at least according to the title). There would need to be an equivalent server library implementation, not to mention all of the necessary non Wayland protocol code (libinput, drm, etc). Still the easiest means to port StumpWM would be to use c bindings for wlroots
- medo-bear 4y agoyou might find this interesting https://github.com/stumpwm/mahogany https://github.com/stumpwm/mahogany
- podiki 4y agoYes, let's get some work on this and then I can finally move to Wayland!
- headhasthoughts 4y agoIt's open source. Have you contributed?
- podiki 4y agoI've done a little (very little) on Stump/contrib and it is on my list to look into. But I know nothing of Wayland (internals especially) and would prefer something that is at least a little usable to hack on while using it. I don't think this is far along, based on the readme at least. I'm also worried if I start down this path I won't (want to) do anything else at my computer besides work on that, so much do I love Lisp-y things :) Have you? (I've taken your comment in good faith and ask you the same in return)
- forgotpwd16 4y ago>This branch contains a version of Mahogany using a backend written in C. The old version written entirely in Common Lisp can be found in the full-cl-old branch. Why the change?
- medo-bear 4y agomaybe its in their github issues. my guess is to get a working version in optimal time