4 ms·
> Which they have because of homeowners like you, I guess. All of my security cameras are isolated on my network. They do not exchange packets with the public
by r3trohack3r 4y ago
> Which they have because of homeowners like you, I guess.
All of my security cameras are isolated on my network. They do not exchange packets with the public internet. They can not phone home to the manufacturer.
If law enforcement has footage from my surveillance system, it’s because they have a warrant or because I willingly handed the footage over to them after someone made a bad decision on my property.
- giraffe_lady 4y ago> they have a warrant or because I willingly handed the footage over to them Yes, that was the assumption I had in mind while writing that.
- brnaftr361 4y agoGreat, so now you're surveilling your family. It's still a violation of privacy, perhaps even moreso because you, an intimate, now have a much wider view of your family's behavior. It's weird and unnatural. And you may say today that you're a beneficent broker of this information, but tomorrow when your wife or your children in some manner act aberrantly - viola your opinion suddenly changes - you'll leverage it for some self-concerned motive. At least with a third party monitoring shit there's not such a considerable conflict of interest. But none of it is really reasonable. And criminals will adapt - they have way more options than you do.