Is this just a general problem in science? Science is highly objective, but the process of attaining scientific credibility is prone to all kinds of human prob

Is this just a general problem in science? Science is highly objective, but the process of attaining scientific credibility is prone to all kinds of human problems. Expecting the judicial system to sort through this better than the scientific community seems foolish. Ideally, a high-enough percentage of scientifically-educated people would mean more skeptical jurors, defense attorneys who more able to challenge experts, and judges more able to keep junk science out entirely.