2 ms·

Please explain the mistake in the article. > The experiments find no evidence of the effects predicted by at least the simplest varieties of these collapse mod

by lupire 4y ago

Please explain the mistake in the article. > The experiments find no evidence of the effects predicted by at least the simplest varieties of these collapse models.

bowsamic 4y ago
I have no idea, sorry
pfortuny 4y ago
No, the mistake is in the natural interpretation of the title. The title seems to imply "collapse is not a thing", whereas the article is about "these explanations of collapse do not hold".