4 ms·

Well, models will be taken down anyway (at least attempted), save whatever you can put hands on. It is happening, govt is just catching up with this rapid situa

Well, models will be taken down anyway (at least attempted), save whatever you can put hands on. It is happening, govt is just catching up with this rapid situation: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/10/13/2022-21658/implementation-of-additional-export-controls-certain-advanced-computing-and-semiconductor https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/10/13/2022-21... (AI mentioned 4 times) https://eshoo.house.gov/sites/eshoo.house.gov/files/9.20.22LettertoNSCandOSTPonStabilityAI.pdf https://eshoo.house.gov/sites/eshoo.house.gov/files/9.20.22L... (at the very end "export controls" are mentioned multiple times)

EMIRELADERO 4y ago
Keep in mind that the last link points to a letter that's (allegedly) only from one member of the House of Representatives. What people need to understand is that the bar for worryingness shouldn't be "government looking into it". Governments look into things all the time, and in such a diverse environment as the U.S legislative branch, we cannot just pack every opinion of every member into a single "government" momolith. That is why, in fact, we even have legislative systems with different representatives from different parties at all. This isn't an undesirable effect, this is how it's supposed to work, and in a good way.