> You seem to be implying that it's right and proper for cities to have high crime. That's a really odd reading. From my vantage point it looks more like anecd

> You seem to be implying that it's right and proper for cities to have high crime. That's a really odd reading. From my vantage point it looks more like anecdotal evidence from within an area with usually lower crime rates and attempting to extrapolate to the larger city/ies. I don't see a value judgment at all.