3 ms·

> And then if a car even dares to accidentally not see them because they sat in their blind spot they flip a shit Oh god, that is the most annoying complaint I

by dntrkv 4y ago

> And then if a car even dares to accidentally not see them because they sat in their blind spot they flip a shit Oh god, that is the most annoying complaint I ever hear. Such a common post on any moto-focused discussion site. Usually involves an idiot on a bike cruising next to a car and then overreacting when the car begins to merge into their lane. Happens all the fucking time if you've ridden for longer than a day. Get over it and get better at anticipating it. Two rules of riding that have kept me safe for a couple hundred thousand miles of riding: 1. Always assume the cars next to you will merge into your lane. 2. ABP, Always Be Passing. Going at the flow of traffic is dangerous. Going slower than traffic is even more dangerous.

thot_experiment 4y ago
ABP, Always Be Passing. This cannot be overstated, it's a lot easier to deal with problems in your field of vision than ones rapidly approaching from behind. That's also why filtering is so important, and it's heinous that it's not allowed in some (most?) states. If you're able to filter you can use your superior acceleration to always be ahead of cars. It's true of bikes too, that's why treating red lights as stop signs on a bicycle is something that needs wider legal adoption. I often do it anyway and it means that in city traffic I am sometimes able to traverse a block without ever being passed by a car.
- NoPicklez 4y ago
  "treating red lights as stop signs" as in being able to go through red lights? Or am I mistaken?
  - thot_experiment 4y ago
    I'm not sure I understand your question precisely, but this article will probably answer it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idaho_stop https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idaho_stop
    - NoPicklez 4y ago
      Sorry I didn't realise this existed, does it mean that as a cyclist you can ride through a red light permitted there is no traffic and you first come to a complete stop?

by dntrkv 4y ago

thot_experiment 4y ago

ABP, Always Be Passing. This cannot be overstated, it's a lot easier to deal with problems in your field of vision than ones rapidly approaching from behind. That's also why filtering is so important, and it's heinous that it's not allowed in some (most?) states. If you're able to filter you can use your superior acceleration to always be ahead of cars. It's true of bikes too, that's why treating red lights as stop signs on a bicycle is something that needs wider legal adoption. I often do it anyway and it means that in city traffic I am sometimes able to traverse a block without ever being passed by a car.

NoPicklez 4y ago
"treating red lights as stop signs" as in being able to go through red lights? Or am I mistaken?
- thot_experiment 4y ago
  I'm not sure I understand your question precisely, but this article will probably answer it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idaho_stop https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idaho_stop
  - NoPicklez 4y ago
    Sorry I didn't realise this existed, does it mean that as a cyclist you can ride through a red light permitted there is no traffic and you first come to a complete stop?