5 ms·
Fire 90% of their team. Have a 500 people company, that's still 25x the size of the original WhatsApp.
by dannyw 4y ago
Fire 90% of their team. Have a 500 people company, that's still 25x the size of the original WhatsApp.
- edmundsauto 4y agoFire the team, load up with debt, plump the numbers and find a bigger fool. Mine the brand rep and loyal user base. Sounds like a private equity dream, if interest rates were lower.
- mhh__ 4y agoWhatsapp don't sell ads though Don't get me wrong I think you're probably right but snap's business model is not just a pure tech issue at scale, i.e. you need old fashioned sales
- mapme 4y agoI think this is an unhelpful comparison. Simply put, when users exchange messages on WhatsApp it causes minimal traffic to a WhatsApp data enter as it’s mostly p2p. No ads, no persistence. Snapchat requires semi persistence for stories (viewable for 24hr) and millions of users can view a single story. When a celebrity posts a story and 5mil users view it that requires more engineering effort that p2p what’s app messages. Additionally, serving ads requires a large amount of compute (ad ranking/serving), storage (impressions), offline processing (Hadoop clusters are hard), engineering, salepeople, economists, and auxiliary systems to support advertisers buying ads, etc. As an example, check out snaps blog post on ML and ads https://eng.snap.com/en-US/machine-learning-snap-ad-ranking https://eng.snap.com/en-US/machine-learning-snap-ad-ranking