4 ms·

> They are only suing when the memorizer is trying to make money off of the song without permission of the copyright holder. Granted everything I know about co

> They are only suing when the memorizer is trying to make money off of the song without permission of the copyright holder. Granted everything I know about copyright law I learned in a few audio tapes in my car, but I think the question I have is not, can you sue AI for absorbing information, but is AI unique enough that you couldn't find byte strings or patterns that match source material too closely. See the recent twitter thread on CSParse for example: https://twitter.com/docsparse/status/1581461734665367554 https://twitter.com/docsparse/status/1581461734665367554

gitfan86 4y ago
It is just weights, there is no string of bytes
- mikkergp 4y ago
  I’m talking about outputs not the model itself, the GitHub copilot example has lots of shared bytes
- lbotos 4y ago
  You are correct that the "model" may be a separate piece of work with it's own copyright but that does not mean that the model does not produce copyrighted works.