Notice that the article is dated April 1st. Also, I think you are missing some context from bygone days. In the 1970s, a writer for a magazine like Cycle Worl

Notice that the article is dated April 1st. Also, I think you are missing some context from bygone days. In the 1970s, a writer for a magazine like Cycle World would not have thought it shameful to learn from another culture, and therefore wouldn't have realized that describing the history of a non-Western country acquiring intellectual capital comes off as accusatory and racist. They also would not have identified with Harley Davidson on nationalistic or racial grounds, as the magazine was written by and for people who rode all sorts of other motorcycles and therefore were harmed by protectionist policies. So I wouldn't take the overall story as accusatory or suggesting Japan "owed" H-D something. In a 21st century context, it definitely would indicate racial animus or chauvinism, but back then, it was normal for people to write from a more detached perspective.