> No, that would be much less accurate to say. You don't know that. If I was premature in making a guess, you were equally premature in contradicting it. What'

> No, that would be much less accurate to say. You don't know that. If I was premature in making a guess, you were equally premature in contradicting it. What's your interpretation? That they meant 96% of the total? I might enjoy seeing you explain how that could be true while still leaving 600K Amazon/Apple profiles to be cleaned up in a special campaign responding to media exposure. Do you think it's 96% of what they could have caught by manually examining every profile? That's no more supportable than the theory you summarily rejected. Your own guesses or assumptions are no better than anyone else's.