It's literally in the rest of the description you just cut off to form these silly hypotheticals. It's a very simple two part test with a big "and" clause conn

It's literally in the rest of the description you just cut off to form these silly hypotheticals. It's a very simple two part test with a big "and" clause connecting them. > a. There is a substantial connection between the lack of good moral character of the individual and the professional responsibilities of a registered contractor; and > b. The finding by the board of lack of good moral character is supported by clear and convincing evidence. A roofing contractor cheating on their husband has no substantial connection to the professional responsibilities of being a contractor. Neither does being arrested for possession. Both would be granted their license. If the person arrested for drugs was stealing copper from construction sites - they might have a hard time, but that's by design..