7 ms·

(I am not a lawyer) Wouldn’t some aspect of the case be about whether the defendants actually knew for a fact if Hans was cheating? In other words, were they s

(I am not a lawyer) Wouldn’t some aspect of the case be about whether the defendants actually knew for a fact if Hans was cheating? In other words, were they saying “Hans cheated in this tournament and we have the proof” or “Hans’ play has been super sketchy he’s cheating”. There seems to me a difference here, both in intent and scope.

frumper 4y ago
Yes, but Hans has to prove they knowingly said false statements. The defendants don't have to prove what they said is true.
- remarkEon 4y ago
  Hans has quite the uphill battle then.