3 ms·
> believed it would stop transmission It did lower transmission. Multiple studies confirmed this. > remember that wasn’t the messaging Yes, it wasn’t, becaus
by shakezula 4y ago
> believed it would stop transmission
It did lower transmission. Multiple studies confirmed this.
> remember that wasn’t the messaging
Yes, it wasn’t, because it’s generally considered bad practice to attempt to predict the future, and if they had you’d be complaining about them attempting to predict the future.
> the message was “it’s safe and effective and protects others”
All of the data agrees with this statement.
> A lot of damaged trust in institutions these last few years
Yes, I wonder why that is
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- wellthatsawrap1 4y ago> Yes I wonder why that is Because they lied to us.
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 4y agoWould you consider that this could be the goal of ongoing hostile intelligence operations?
- pstuart 4y agoDivided we fall.
- jessaustin 4y agoVery possible that CIA, NED, etc. played a role, but they didn't benefit from vaccine sales nearly as much as the pharma firms did.
- s1artibartfast 4y agoThis is a strong argument for honest messaging which includes the appropriate caveats