3 ms·

I'm not sure why you're trying to play devil's advocate on that. The things they are claiming about the analysis techniques literally have no basis in evidence.

• JoeAltmaier 4y ago
  ...and I countered with "the physics surely have validity", which the plentiful science done to date has corroborated. Not playing devil's advocate; just doing some simple searches and calling out hyperbole. These days folks have replaced science with advocacy. You know, that thing lawyers do to convince a jury. To the point folks think that you can arrive at a conclusion with advocacy. Instead of looking at the data. I'd ramble on about how the world is going to pot, because folks thing a sarcastic remark or clever-sounding turn of phrase is 'just as good' as facts. But oh well.
  • snapcaster 4y ago
    "Blood spatter analysis" is not a physics based discipline. The other comment responding to you with the analogy about astrology is good explanation of what is wrong with your reasoning
  • kortilla 4y ago
    You confused the GP statement about “blood spatter analysis” with a statement about “blood spatter”. If someone critiques astrology you don’t reply that “planets follow physics”.