3 ms·
I think it still works for that. In the OnStar case you have the option to decline the service, but you still need to pay for it. That would likely run afoul of
by devrand 4y ago
I think it still works for that. In the OnStar case you have the option to decline the service, but you still need to pay for it. That would likely run afoul of the requirement that it has ongoing costs to support the service.
So I think this law would force automakers to either back-off or include it in the MSRP.
- neogodless 4y ago> you have the option to decline the service, but you still need to pay for it That's not how "declining a service" should work. How about I don't pay for it and then I don't get the service!