3 ms·
>doesn't really answer the question of why it's so bad to conduct interviews the other way Easy - if you think you have to divulge "company secrets" to do an i
by warrenm 4y ago
>doesn't really answer the question of why it's so bad to conduct interviews the other way
Easy - if you think you have to divulge "company secrets" to do an interview, you're blatantly incompetent
I've been at this a long time - >20y
I never need to divulge "company secrets" (or "customer secrets", given I'm in professional services) to perform an interview on either side of the equation
- drakonka 4y agoThank you, I've been at it for a fairly long time also. I'm not totally sure how your reply relates to my comment, since my first sentence says: "Of course it's possible to conduct interviews without giving out sensitive info..." Nobody's arguing that anybody absolutely _needs_ to divulge "company secrets". I'm simply saying freedom to say and show more rather than less can make for a more interesting interview.